Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: You can request more content in your language…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Would you like more of PEP’s content in your own language? We encourage you to talk with your country’s Psychoanalytic Journals and tell them about PEP Web.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Michels, R. (1995). Commentaries. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 43:1023-1026.

(1995). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43:1023-1026

Commentaries

Robert Michels

Psychoanalysts have paid relatively little attention to the recent flurry of interest in psychiatric diagnostic categories. The reason for this is easy to understand. Unlike descriptive psychiatrists, psychoanalysts are interested in the meaning of the individual patient's experience, how it stems from his earlier life and will go on to shape his future, and how it is reflected in, and can be modified by, the analytic process, rather than the description and labeling of its surface manifestations.

When psychoanalysts shift their attention from their patients, where they are expert, to the world of scholarly dialogue, where they are amateurs, they often shift strategies as well. Now they are intensely interested in categories—for example, whether or not psychoanalysis is a science. This question may interest some philosophers of science, at least those who are concerned with demarcating the boundaries of their discipline rather than exploring fascinating phenomena wherever their method may prove fruitful. However, I don't understand why psychoanalysts should care, and I suspect that, other than for reasons of pride, most of them don't.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.