Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: Books are sorted alphabetically…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The list of books available on PEP Web is sorted alphabetically, with the exception of Freud’s Collected Works, Glossaries, and Dictionaries. You can find this list in the Books Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bachant, J.L. Adler, E. (1997). Transference: Co-Constructed Or Brought To The Interaction?. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45:1097-1120.

(1997). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45:1097-1120

Transference: Co-Constructed Or Brought To The Interaction?

Janet Lee Bachant and Elliot Adler

Contemporary understandings of transference diverge around the issue of whether transference is co-constructed by both parties to the analytic interaction or brought to it by each participant. Examining the evolution of the concept of transference distills some of the issues inherent in this controversy. It is suggested that each of these conceptualizations contributes something essential to the development of a broader picture of the way transference functions in the clinical setting. If transference is viewed as a process operating along a continuum of repression, both co-construction of the interaction and the primitive wishes, fears, and fantasies brought to the interaction can be parsimoniously accounted for. Adaptive and archaic transference activity are distinguished, and the two dimensions of transference, dynamically interconnected, are shown to be essential aspects of analytic understanding.

Alongside resistance, unconscious fantasy, compromise formation, and defense, transference stands as a nucleus of psychoanalytic thinking about technique. It is especially prized for its ability to crystallize the meaning of current patterns of interaction, as well as for its

capacity to uncover the perpetually active unconscious wishes and fears from childhood that continue to organize experience. Acknowledged as a central dynamic force within the psychoanalytic situation since Freud's postscript to the Dora case (1905), this concept has generated an enormous and continually expanding literature. Burgeoning discussion among analysts of different theoretical persuasions is currently stimulating creative reformulations and innovative approaches to understanding the process of transference. Many of the most salient issues in this controversy converge on the question of whether transference is better conceived as co-constructed in the analytic situation or brought to the analytic interaction by the patient.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.