Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Britton, R.S. (1999). Oedipal Paradigms in Collision: Howard H. Covitz. New York: Peter Lang, 1997, 385 pp., $59.95.. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 47(1):253-255.

(1999). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47(1):253-255

Oedipal Paradigms in Collision: Howard H. Covitz. New York: Peter Lang, 1997, 385 pp., $59.95. Related Papers

Review by:
Ronald S. Britton

This book presents itself both as a review of the development of the concept of the oedipus complex over the last hundred years and as the author's own reconceptualization. The author has a very definite view of his own and works toward this by giving us his own account and critique of the development of psychoanalytic theory within different schools of thought. This approach is reminiscent of that of Guntrip (1969), as are a number of the ideas and judgments in the book. Guntrip's book had a wide appeal for those interested in psychoanalysis who wanted to be brought up to date as quickly as possible with a sketch map of the analytic terrain since Freud and who wanted an alternative to “American orthodoxy.” Covitz, however, is even more partial than Guntrip was.

He begins by giving an account of Freud's ideas from 1897 to the later stages of his life and work. This section is well organized and informative. He follows it with an account of American ego psychology and then describes the thinking of important American analysts such as Mahler, Erikson, and Jacobson. This is the best part of the book; unfortunately for American readers, the account that follows of the European schools of thought about which they might be curious is much less satisfactory. The reader will look in vain for an account of the French school. Except for Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel, who is incorrectly described as Kleinian, no French author of note who has written on the oedipus complex features in this historical review.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.