Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To bookmark an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to save an article in your browser’s Bookmarks for quick access? Press Ctrl + D and a dialogue box will open asking how you want to save it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rubovits-Seitz, P. (2000). Commentary. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48(2):391-396.

(2000). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48(2):391-396


Philip Rubovits-Seitz

This discussion presents arguments for two proposed improvements in psychoanalytic case reports—namely, more frequent reports of the whole analysis, and greater emphasis on the presentation of clinical evidence. These two suggested improvements are related, because an important source of clinical evidence—the justification of interpretations—draws on the data of the whole analysis.

Early in his essay, Michels notes that our clinical literature consists largely of vignettes rather than full-length accounts of the therapeutic process, and he asks why this is so. In one of his writings, Freud (1918) asserted that reporting a complete history is both “technically impractical” and “socially impermissible,” and would in any event be “unconvincing” (p. 8). Elsewhere, however (Freud 1905), he concluded that an “intelligent, consistent and unbroken case history” is possible only at the end of a treatment; that completed cases offer the advantage of hindsight; and that definitive interpretation of any fragment must await completion of the whole analysis (p. 18)—in short, “the whole analysis is needed to explain it” (Freud 1911p. 93; see also Schafer 1986p. 156; Goldberg 1997p. 437). Thus, the preparation of a case report is best postponed until the analysis is over.

In his report of the Wolf Man, Freud (1918) referred to still another advantage of waiting until the end of an analysis before writing a report of the case. He indicated that all of the information that made it possible to understand the patient's neurosis “was derived from the last period of the work, during which resistance temporarily disappeared and the patient gave an impression of lucidity which is usually attainable only in hypnosis” (p.11;

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.