Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hirsch, I. (2003). Psychoanalytic Theory as a Form of Countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51S(Supplement):181-201.

(2003). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51S(Supplement):181-201

Scientific Papers

Psychoanalytic Theory as a Form of Countertransference

Irwin Hirsch

Contradictions abound when one addresses the question of how theory affects clinical practice and, to stretch the question further, how theory helps analysts be clinically useful to patients. Most analysts, of any school, would like to believe that they can see patients as they really are, free of the analyst's memory and desire (Bion 1967). This might be conceptualized as the analyst's being an empty container or blank screen, a purely empathic observer, or an objective reader of patients' transferences or internalized patterns. Ideally, theory might serve as an anchor or provide some frame to make sense of what might otherwise be an overwhelming input of confusing raw data. Theory might also guide practice enough to control the influence of the analyst's personality or unwitting participation with patients. It would not however, bias analytic inquiry, the nature of the data being sought, or ways of comprehending and interpreting individual patients. Yet early in the development of the profession, Ferenczi and Rank (1924) sharply criticized clinical psychoanalysis for becoming excessively dominated by theory, thereby severely compromising the understanding of the unique individuality of each patient and each dyad (see Wolstein 1959, 1975). In much psychoanalytic writing, it was hard to distinguish one patient from another.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.