Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see the German word that Freud used to refer to a concept…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to know the exact German word that Freud used to refer to a psychoanalytic concept? Move your mouse over a paragraph while reading The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud and a window will emerge displaying the text in its original German version.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hirsch, I. (2003). Psychoanalytic Theory as a Form of Countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51S(Supplement):181-201.

(2003). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51S(Supplement):181-201

Scientific Papers

Psychoanalytic Theory as a Form of Countertransference

Irwin Hirsch

Contradictions abound when one addresses the question of how theory affects clinical practice and, to stretch the question further, how theory helps analysts be clinically useful to patients. Most analysts, of any school, would like to believe that they can see patients as they really are, free of the analyst's memory and desire (Bion 1967). This might be conceptualized as the analyst's being an empty container or blank screen, a purely empathic observer, or an objective reader of patients' transferences or internalized patterns. Ideally, theory might serve as an anchor or provide some frame to make sense of what might otherwise be an overwhelming input of confusing raw data. Theory might also guide practice enough to control the influence of the analyst's personality or unwitting participation with patients. It would not however, bias analytic inquiry, the nature of the data being sought, or ways of comprehending and interpreting individual patients. Yet early in the development of the profession, Ferenczi and Rank (1924) sharply criticized clinical psychoanalysis for becoming excessively dominated by theory, thereby severely compromising the understanding of the unique individuality of each patient and each dyad (see Wolstein 1959, 1975). In much psychoanalytic writing, it was hard to distinguish one patient from another.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.