Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Vega, J.A. (2013). Silence, Now. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 61(6):1211-1225.

(2013). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 61(6):1211-1225

Silence, Now

Jason A. Wheeler Vega

A panel discussion on the subject of silence may bring to mind the variously attributed maxim, “Talking about music is like dancing about architecture.” The implication is that the attempt to do either, the latter more clearly than the former, is what mid-century analytic philosophers called a category mistake: an illegitimate confusion of two radically different kinds of things. The artist and experimental musician Laurie Anderson (to whom the saying is sometimes credited) is reported to have supplied a riposte: “How about a square dance?” (Scott 2010). Psychoanalysts are ideally more comfortable than many with paradox, an attitude stemming from our acquaintance with the primary processes of the mind, to which appearance and contradiction are no obstacle. Hence, a panel of four distinguished analysts talking at length about silence should cause no more than a brief tremor of absurdity, easily shaken off. In the report to follow I will try to convey as much as possible of the proceedings and each member's contribution, though much detail must be omitted for the sake of brevity and confidentiality. In places I will add my own gloss or elaborations, and will note these as they occur. Otherwise, the reader should assume that the text is a paraphrase of the presentations.

The panel was structured by the chair, Melinda Gellman, to be more a roundtable discussion than the traditional sequence of speakers followed by a discussant offering a summary and interpretation of the presentations. After introductory remarks by Gellman, Jody Messier Davies and Ronald Britton presented their work, followed by a mid-panel discussion of their papers by all four panelists. Salman Akhtar and Virginia Ungar then presented their papers, followed again by discussion among the panelists. As reporter, I was then invited to comment before the floor was opened for questions.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.