Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Blass, R.B. (2015). Psychoanalytic Theories as Efforts to Grasp the True (Not Fictional) Nature of Human Reality: Commentary on Greenberg. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 63(1):47-63.

(2015). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 63(1):47-63

Psychoanalytic Theories as Efforts to Grasp the True (Not Fictional) Nature of Human Reality: Commentary on Greenberg Related Papers

Rachel B. Blass

Were I to agree with the position Jay Greenberg advances in “Therapeutic Action and the Analyst's Responsibility,” I would probably not be writing this commentary. I would regard our positions and whatever differences we have as unbased beliefs, derivatives of the fictions that guide our respective ways of perceiving and understanding psychoanalysis. Ignorant of their fictional nature, I may pursue dialogue, but aware of it there would be no real point in doing so.

However, I disagree with his position and so am happy to have this opportunity for dialogue over our differences. This is because while my views may be mistaken, I don't think they are ungrounded fictions. Rather, they are expressions of my best effort to grasp the reality in which we live, are largely motivated by a desire to truthfully encounter reality, and to some extent succeed in doing so. I would like to share how and why I see things, so that others may come to recognize what is true in what I see and may help me question what is false in it. I am inclined to believe that this is what Greenberg hopes for too, as he opens his thoughts to discussion.

To summarize Greenberg's central claims as I understand them: Psychoanalytic models and their theories of therapeutic action are fictions.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.