Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fereday, G. (2015). Response to ‘A Long-Term Strategy for the Profession’ by Nigel Burch. Brit. J. Psychother., 31(1):134-135.

(2015). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 31(1):134-135

Response to ‘A Long-Term Strategy for the Profession’ by Nigel Burch

Gary Fereday

Dear Editor

Nigel Burch (BJP 30[3]) is right to call for a long-term strategy for our profession, where psychoanalytic understanding of human relations ranks alongside economics in the formulation of public policy.

At the famous 1918 Budapest conference, Freud and the early pioneers laid out their vision for the profession, seeing it as having three key components: research, training and subsidized clinics. It would seem to me that we have succeeded in just one of those activities, training, and even then only partially. Whilst our psychoanalytic/ Jungian/psychodynamic trainings are all intellectually robust and underpinned by impressive academic credentials, they have tended to develop in a fragmented and hierarchical manner. They are not particularly economically or socially accessible and have tended to place intensive individual work at the apex of a complex hierarchical structure.

We are now faced with the reality of our history, with a high concentration of relatively small competing training institutions, often geographically concentrated in fashionable suburbs of north London, with an implicit orientation towards training to work in private practice.

Why does this matter? Well it matters because it makes our profession inaccessible for many people: financially, geographically, socially and culturally, resulting in a professional demographic that does not reflect wider society. In this slightly rarefied climate, innovation has often been driven from an intellectual locus without regard to the changing external environment.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.