Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: For example:
Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Abse, S. (2013). When a Problem Shared is a Problem … Whose Illness is it Anyway? Questions of Technique When Working with a Borderline Couple. Cpl. Fam. Psychoanal., 3(2):163-177.
(2013). Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 3(2):163-177
When a Problem Shared is a Problem … Whose Illness is it Anyway? Questions of Technique When Working with a Borderline Couple
This paper focuses on the location of illness and pathology in couples suffering from substantial disturbance and discusses some of the issues facing clinicians when working with these challenging couples.
There is a debate at present about the kind of patients that I am referring to. In the psychoanalytic papers that most of us are familiar with, these patients are classified as “borderline”, and more recently the term “personality disorder” has come into use to describe them. Perhaps an initial diagnostic discussion might be helpful here, so I will quote from the Department of Health's guidance document of 2003, “Personality disorder: no longer a diagnosis of exclusion”.
Health professionals have not always agreed how best to identify personality disorders, but the World Health Organisation has produced a useful definition. The International Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders (ICD-10: WHO, 1992), defines a personality disorder as: “a severe disturbance in the characterological condition and behavioural tendencies of the individual, usually involving several areas of the personality, and nearly always associated with considerable personal and social disruption.” (DoH, 2003, p. 9)
Whatever medical terms we use to identify these patients, I hope that the description I give of these couples will feel sufficiently familiar to clinicians to discuss the working issues they present.
During the progress of a couple therapy, it is usual for our sense of where the problem lies within the couple to move around. It is as though our mind is like a camera lens, moving around different vantage points. First we identify and empathise with what one partner says. Seconds later, the lens is pointing a different way and we see another picture. These different points of view that occur inside us over and over again are only manageable because of the fundamental stance of a couple psychotherapist.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]