Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager?  Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format.  You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hewison, D. (2016). “The effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies: an update” by Peter Fonagy, World Psychiatry, 14(2): 137–150, 2015. Cpl. Fam. Psychoanal., 6(2):215-217.

(2016). Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 6(2):215-217

Occasional Review

“The effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies: an update” by Peter Fonagy, World Psychiatry, 14(2): 137–150, 2015

Review by:
Reviewed by David Hewison, D.Cpl.Psych.Psych.

Peter Fonagy's extensive review of the evidence for psychodynamic psychotherapy as an effective treatment for a variety of mental health disorders aims at doing a number of different things: firstly, it outlines the current confusing state of evidence for psychodynamic therapy, indicating the complexity inherent in trying to rely on heterogeneous research studies; secondly, it goes through a variety of mental health diagnoses indicating where there is evidence for the effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and where there is not; and finally, it suggests that the whole research endeavour of trying to test families of brand-name psychotherapies against headline diagnoses is a mistaken and fruitless endeavour. He suggests instead paying very close attention to exactly what it is in any therapy that works for any particular person with their individual deficits and difficulties that are hidden under an overarching diagnosis.

What is it that is confusing about the state of evidence for psychodynamic therapy? It is not the absence of such evidence, because numerous studies show that psychodynamic therapy appears to work. It is, rather, the small size of such studies that makes them unconvincing on their own, and the problem that comes with the attempt to remedy this by aggregating them all into meta-analyses. These combine the statistically significant results of the studies and subject them to further analysis, leading to a pooled effect size (an indication of how helpful they are as a therapy).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2016 and more current articles see the publishers official website.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.