Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device.  (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Scharff, D.E. (2017). Reply to Catriona Wrottesley's Commentary. Cpl. Fam. Psychoanal., 7(1):113-116.

(2017). Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 7(1):113-116

Reply to Catriona Wrottesley's Commentary Related Papers

David E. Scharff, M.D.

I am most grateful to Catriona Wrottesley for her scholarly commentary on my clinical paper on a Chinese couple. Her thoughtful re-examination of this case is exactly the kind of comparative study that I hope for in presenting such material, which in my mind lends itself both to the study of the conduct of couple assessment and therapy, and to the consideration of cultural issues that increasingly are in the forefront of our clinical consideration.

Through much of her discussion, Wrottesley highlights the implicit dialogue between the levels of consideration in this clinical intervention. On the one hand, there are discussions of the cultural and sociological underpinnings of the couple's organisation that also contribute to their difficulties. And, on the other hand, we must return to psychoanalytic considerations about the nature of developmental and characterological difficulties that underlie the couple's impasse. It is not so easy to move between these levels, but it is my hope that presenting this kind of material will let us do so. We really face the same question when we consider Western couples, but in some ways it is harder for us to see the implications of our own embedded values and cultural inheritance when we therapists are of the same culture as that of our patients.

There are many issues to take up in Wrottesley's thoughtful discussion, and I will not do justice to all of them. I will take them up roughly in the order in which she discussed them. First, there is the public setting of the interviews.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2016 and more current articles see the publishers official website.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.