Tip: To save a shortcut to an article to your desktop…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
The way you save a shortcut to an article on your desktop depends on what internet browser (and device) you are using.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
McCann, D. (2017). Response to The Role of Interpretation in the Assessment Phase of Couple Psychoanalysis by Timothy Keogh and Cynthia Gregory-Roberts. Cpl. Fam. Psychoanal., 7(2):181-184.
(2017). Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 7(2):181-184
Response to The Role of Interpretation in the Assessment Phase of Couple Psychoanalysis by Timothy Keogh and Cynthia Gregory-Roberts
Damian McCann, D.Sys.Psych.
By way of opening my response to Timothy Keogh and Cynthia Gregory-Roberts’s paper “The role of interpretation in the assessment phase of couple psychoanalysis”, I feel the need to remind ourselves that the main body of thinking and development with regard to interpretation still comes from analytic work with individuals; we are therefore constantly faced with the challenge of translating that which is applicable to individuals to our work with couples. However, it is generally recognised that interpretations that resonate with patients are an essential part of most assessment interviews, since interpretations convey to patients the fact that they are understood. Interpretations also help in establishing rapport, which, in turn, assists in the search for; more meaningful information, a deepening of the transference, and, of course, insight.
Part of the translation from individual to couple therapy lies in the therapist being able to hold what Morgan (2005) refers to as “a couple state of mind”, since the couple therapist will inevitably be searching for some preliminary understanding of the area in which the couple’s shared anxieties and unconscious phantasies lie. Indeed, the authors suggest that, “… interpretation was primarily used as a means of engaging them (the couple) in a transformative psychoanalytic process”.
What is specific to psychoanalytic, and indeed all psychotherapeutic work, including that of first encounters, is how therapists listen and respond to the patient and, perhaps even more importantly, how he or she reflects on his or her mode of listening and responding. With that in mind, I think it is worth considering the nature of the reflective function offered by the authors’ co-therapy relationship and its particular contribution to the question of interpretation in the assessment of their couple’s presenting problem, as a gateway to the ongoing therapy.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2016 and more current articles see the publishers official website.]