Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: For example:
Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Glouberman, S. (2005). Building on Bion: Roots, Origins and Context of Bion's Contributions to Theory and Practice, and Building on Bion: Branches, Contemporary Developments and Applications of Bion's Contributions to Theory and Practice edited by Robert M. Lipgar and Malcolm Pines London, New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, International Library of Group Analysis (Vols. 20, 21), 2003, 272 pp; 320 pp.. Canadian J. Psychoanal., 13(1):131-134.
(2005). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 13(1):131-134
Building on Bion: Roots, Origins and Context of Bion's Contributions to Theory and Practice, and Building on Bion: Branches, Contemporary Developments and Applications of Bion's Contributions to Theory and Practice edited by Robert M. Lipgar and Malcolm Pines London, New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, International Library of Group Analysis (Vols. 20, 21), 2003, 272 pp; 320 pp.
Review by: Susan Glouberman
In Psychic Retreats Steiner (1993) writes, “[I]t is better to have a conscious theory than an unconscious prejudice.” I would like to draw upon Steiner's words, and also leap from them, to add, “It is better to have a conscious preference than an unconscious prejudice.”
My conscious preference in psychoanalytic writing in general is for clinical writing, or for linking the clinical to the theoretical, and my preference, more specifically in the work of Bion, is in the child and adult analytic/therapeutic relationship, and not necessarily in the group process.
And so although I found the titles of these two volumes to be somewhat misleading in their omission of “the group,” I, and I hope the reader, can accommodate to that.
What I found somewhat more difficult to accommodate to, albeit with some good exceptions, is that there are not enough clinical examples of the workings of the groups described here, that there is more of a “telling” than a “showing,” and that there is not enough “learning from experience,” which was central to Bion's work, and which has, by now, become the expected and familiar hallmark of both new and classic writings on Bion (e.g., Bott-Spillius, 1988; Meltzer & Williams, 1988; O'Shaughnessy, 1992; Waddell, 1999).
That said, these are dense, serious, and scholarly books, and the contributions from authors from various parts of the world—Italy, France, Argentina, Brazil, the United States, and Great Britain—attest to Bion's broad influence.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]