Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see the German word that Freud used to refer to a concept…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to know the exact German word that Freud used to refer to a psychoanalytic concept? Move your mouse over a paragraph while reading The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud and a window will emerge displaying the text in its original German version.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gill, M.M. (1989). Comments and Criticisms. Contemp. Psychoanal., 25:159-160.

(1989). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 25:159-160

Comments and Criticisms

Merton M. Gill, M.D.

To the Editor:

I AM RESPONDING TO L. JOSEPHS' ARTICLE WHICH appeared in this Journal recently. I believe it deals with an important topic. I disagree with it in some major respects because Josephs especially singles me out as guilty of "archaeological listening" with regard to formal regression, although he applauds my "empathic listening" with regard to temporal regression.

At first blush Josephs seems to be on the side of the angels. He wants the analyst to respect the patient's experience and he decries the analyst who narcissistically and authoritarianly proclaims himself the arbiter of reality. Who could disagree with that?

But a major flaw in his argument is that he is attempting to convert a continuum into a dichotomy. He comes close to recognizing that himself when he says that "… although interventions which serve to reflect, clarify, and crystallize can also distort … there is less room for misunderstanding …" (emphasis added, p. 289). So he does recogize that interpreting is acceptable, but that some interpretations are better than others because they do not depart too far from the patient's experience.

Furthermore Josephs is not above setting up a straw man when dealing with what he calls archaeological listening.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.