Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Morrison, A.P. (2008). Shame—Considerations and Revisions: Discussion of Papers by Sandra Buechler and Donna Orange. Contemp. Psychoanal., 44(1):105-109.

(2008). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 44(1):105-109

Shame—Considerations and Revisions: Discussion of Papers by Sandra Buechler and Donna Orange

Andrew P. Morrison, M.D.

Sandra Buechler's sensitive and thoughtful presentation of shame, and the process of shaming psychoanalytic candidates, is convincing and confronting. She raises consciousness regarding shame of all concerned with the education of future psychoanalysts. Her paper is rife with what I have called “the language of shame” (Morrison, 1996)—words like inadequate, compare, naked, exposed, disappear, ineptness, incapacity, evaluated, competition, failure, envy, shadows, limitations. These words and the images they evoke form a veritable mantel of shame that burdens candidates at times, as they do so many of the rest of us. Buechler offers several guidelines to help mitigate some of the potentially shaming and harmful effects of training and supervision on candidates. Among the most helpful of these, I found, are the effort to generate in candidates curiosity about and anticipation and acceptance of (inevitable) shame during training; recognition that shame itself occurs naturally and inexorably in the training process; support of the candidate's pride in her courage to face and appreciate her experience of shame; and, finally, evolution toward wisdom rather than toward the isolated intellect—to value “savoring” “appreciat[ion] of shades of difference” over cognitive and theoretical hierarchies.

My personal experience with shame has followed the path that Buechler proposes. I first became interested in studying shame because I vaguely sensed it as an important concern of my own, as well as a principal experience of a particular patient of mine. It was in the process of studying and writing about shame—my own and my patient's, and shame's theoretical underpinnings—that I became familiar, accepting, and finally at home with my shame, in this way following Buechler's prescription for dealing with pernicious “shame over shame.”

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.