Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To keep track of most cited articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always keep track of the Most Cited Journal Articles on PEP Web by checking the PEP Section found on the homepage.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Stilman, N. (2009). The Dynamics of Diagnosis A review of Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM), by the PDM Task Force, Silver Spring, MD, 2006, 857 pp.. Contemp. Psychoanal., 45(4):571-576.

(2009). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 45(4):571-576

The Dynamics of Diagnosis A review of Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM), by the PDM Task Force, Silver Spring, MD, 2006, 857 pp.

Review by:
Naemi Stilman, M.D.

I confess that my initial reaction upon hearing of the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM) was one of indifference and dismissiveness. What would be the point, I reflected, of having a parallel system of diagnosis that could not be used practically, that is, for billing purposes or for communication with other medical or clinical specialties? Unlike many of my colleagues, I had always been very comfortable with, even in some ways admiring of, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-III (DSM-III) (American Psychiatric Association, 1980) and its successors (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). I have always liked its phenomenological, atheoretical approach to diagnosis, its clarity and utility. For those of us who began clinical work or study in the pre-DSM era, the DSM was a breath of fresh air. Yes, it entailed a medicalization of psychiatric diagnosis, but its conformity to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) gave it a stamp of legitimacy and eased communication with nonpsychiatric colleagues. I should disclose that I trained and became board certified in internal medicine before training as a psychiatrist, child and adolescent psychiatrist, and adult and child psychoanalyst; I have always wanted psychiatry to be a full child, not a stepchild, of medicine.

That said, as a practicing psychoanalyst and psychodynamically oriented child and adult psychiatrist/therapist, I have found the DSM of limited use in how I actually practice, in how I think about and construct formulations about my patients, and in my supervision of junior colleagues on their long-term therapy cases. Like other analytically trained clinicians I know, I use a combination of specific theory, general psychoanalytic and psychodynamic principles, and knowledge based on study and experience, inference, intuition, and common sense in how I actually understand and treat patients. I felt no great lack in not having a diagnostic manual for this purpose.

So I approached the PDM with considerable skepticism (and, I might add, trepidation, given its size). I am pleased to say that I found myself very pleasantly surprised by the PDM on the whole, with some caveats.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.