Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see author affiliation information in an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To see author affiliation and contact information (as available) in an article, simply click on the Information icon next to the author’s name in every journal article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Krohn, A. (2016). Hysteria: The Elusive Neurosis, 2014. DIVISION/Rev., 15:41-45.

(2016). DIVISION/Review, 15:41-45

Hysteria: The Elusive Neurosis, 2014

Alan Krohn, Ph.D.

an hysteric makes sexuality out of the therapist's science, while the therapist makes science out of sexuality. In this affair, the hysteric has the advantage, there being more sex to science than vice-versa.

(Farber, 1961/1966, p. 124)

How might hysteria be usefully conceptualized? Charcot (1892), Janet (1892), and Breuer and Freud (1893/1955) posited that hysteria was defined by the presence of physical symptoms, such as paralyses, fits, and pain with little or no organic basis—that is conversion symptoms. Over the years a variety of behavioral traits have been added to the definition, including hyperemotionality, manipulativeness, and seductiveness, among many others.

Rangell (1959) persuasively argued in his classic paper that conversion symptoms occur in a wide variety of personality organizations, from the neurotic to the psychotic; they are not limited to one personality type. Psychogenic physical symptoms which have an underlying meaning can occur in many types of patients. Zetzel, in “The So-Called Good Hysteric,” (1968) argued that defining hysteria by overt, behaviorally-defined personality traits is misleading; she cogently argued for a definition that looks at ego functions, personality strengths and deficits, as well as underlying intrapsychic conflicts, to rule a patient in or out of the diagnosis. But many case presentations of purported hysterics over the years begin with unsupported assertions that amount to, “I have an hysterical patient,” and then talk about etiology and other aspects of that patient's problems, without establishing why the patient was considered “hysterical” in the first place.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.