Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).
Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.
Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Krohn, A. (2016). Hysteria: The Elusive Neurosis, 2014. DIVISION/Rev., 15:41-45.
(2016). DIVISION/Review, 15:41-45
Hysteria: The Elusive Neurosis, 2014
Alan Krohn, Ph.D.
an hysteric makes sexuality out of the therapist's science, while the therapist makes science out of sexuality. In this affair, the hysteric has the advantage, there being more sex to science than vice-versa.
(Farber, 1961/1966, p. 124)
How might hysteria be usefully conceptualized? Charcot (1892), Janet (1892), and Breuer and Freud (1893/1955) posited that hysteria was defined by the presence of physical symptoms, such as paralyses, fits, and pain with little or no organic basis—that is conversion symptoms. Over the years a variety of behavioral traits have been added to the definition, including hyperemotionality, manipulativeness, and seductiveness, among many others.
Rangell (1959) persuasively argued in his classic paper that conversionsymptoms occur in a wide variety of personality organizations, from the neurotic to the psychotic; they are not limited to one personality type. Psychogenic physical symptoms which have an underlying meaning can occur in many types of patients. Zetzel, in “The So-Called Good Hysteric,” (1968) argued that defining hysteria by overt, behaviorally-defined personality traits is misleading; she cogently argued for a definition that looks at ego functions, personality strengths and deficits, as well as underlying intrapsychic conflicts, to rule a patient in or out of the diagnosis. But many case presentations of purported hysterics over the years begin with unsupported assertions that amount to, “I have an hysterical patient,” and then talk about etiology and other aspects of that patient's problems, without establishing why the patient was considered “hysterical” in the first place.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]