Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Drescher, J. (2000). Cornucopia: Responses to Rosario, Cohler, Orange, Roughton, and Shelby's Discussions of Psychoanalytic Therapy and the Gay Man. Gender and Psychoanalysis, 5(3):291-319.

(2000). Gender and Psychoanalysis, 5(3):291-319

Cornucopia: Responses to Rosario, Cohler, Orange, Roughton, and Shelby's Discussions of Psychoanalytic Therapy and the Gay Man

Jack Drescher, M.D.

This paper is a response to five discussions of the author's book, Psychoanalytic Therapy and the Gay Man (PT&TGM). As per Vernon Rosario's historical account, the nature–nurture debate begun in the nineteenth century continues to be fraught with political implications to the present day. This paper contends that scientific and psychoanalytic debate parallels moral debates within the larger society insofar as each are concerned with whether same-sex behaviors should be regarded as deviant (illness) or as normal. This paper then takes up Bertram Cohler's contemporary perspective on the nature–nurture debate, particularly those biologizing psychoanalytic theories which reductionistically conflate the biological concept of sexual dimorphism with cultural, binary-gendered meanings of sexual feelings and behaviors.

In response to Donna Orange, this paper takes up the subject of intersubjectivity and mutuality in the clinical setting. Clinical attention to the emotional conclusions that patients have reached in making meaning of their lives is paramount in treatment. A clinical example drawn from PT&TGM illustrates the complexity of working within a hermeneutic approach

when extraclinical material is discovered which seems to be at odds with a patient's actual recollections of a traumatic event.

In response to Ralph Roughton, the paper reviews published anecdotal accounts by prominent gay survivors of the “old psychoanalytic war against homosexuality.” Operating as agents of the antihomosexual beliefs of the larger culture, analysts once put the social ideal of heterosexual hegemony before the analytic principle of respect for patient autonomy. The paper concludes by addressing R. Dennis Shelby's account of his own recent experiences with analytic teachers and supervisors as an openly gay psychoanalytic candidate. In his account can be heard the echoes of a psychoanalytic system that abused everyone who trained in it, regardless of their sexual identity. The abuses of the past have led to an intergenerational transfer of trauma within the psychoanalytic community which still needs to be addressed.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.