Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To contact support with questions…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always contact us directly by sending an email to

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Stephen, A. (1945). (1) Ruminations of a Scientific Secretary. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 26:52-55.

(1945). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 26:52-55

(1) Ruminations of a Scientific Secretary

Adrian Stephen

… So much about the conduct of our meetings; I want now to start a discussion on our research work. In particular I want to raise two questions: as to the possibility of organizing our work more systematically and as to the direction in which, at this moment, research is most likely to be profitable.

So far as I know psycho-analytical research, at any rate in this country, has in the past been mainly a by-product of clinical medicine. In one sense it always must be so—clinical investigation must give us the material for scientific theory; but it has been a by-product in the sense that it is almost a chance result. I mean that analysts have usually accepted just whatever cases offered themselves; there has not been a practice of selecting for treatment cases that might throw light on specific problems.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.