Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access PEP-Web support…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you click on the banner at the top of the website, you will be brought to the page for PEP-Web support.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kanzer, M. Eidelberg, L. (1960). Discussion of 'The Metapsychology of Pleasure'—I. the Structural Description of Pleasure. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 41:368-371.

(1960). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41:368-371

Discussion of 'The Metapsychology of Pleasure'—I. the Structural Description of Pleasure

Mark Kanzer and Ludwig Eidelberg

SUMMARY

1. Certain gaps and inconsistencies in the comparative description of pleasure and unpleasure are pointed out. The uneven development of analytic thinking with respect to these two concepts is discussed.

2. Clarity is sought by using the structural model of unpleasure (as in anxiety) for a corresponding structural model of pleasure.

3. The problem of analytic terminology is then examined in relation to structural description. The consistent usage of the terms perception, sensation, feeling, and affect (emotion), as evolved by analytic tradition, is advocated. It is also recommended that the experiences of pleasure and unpleasure by the ego, which in fact become operative signals of the reality principle, be distinguished semantically from the economic concepts embodied in the term 'pleasure principle'.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.