Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see who cited a particular article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To see what papers cited a particular article, click on “[Who Cited This?] which can be found at the end of every article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Carr, A.C. (1963). II. Observations on Paranoia and their Relationship to the Schreber Case. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 44:195-200.

(1963). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 44:195-200

II. Observations on Paranoia and their Relationship to the Schreber Case

Arthur C. Carr

Observations on Paranoia and their Relationship to the Schreber Case

This paper includes a brief review and evaluation of the major criticisms of the traditional theory of paranoia, followed by some general observations on paranoia regarding such issues as the role of hostility, the essential nature of a delusion, the megalomaniac aspects implicit in all delusions, and rationalization as a defence. An attempt will be made to relate these observations, where pertinent, to the Schreber psychopathology.

Although Freud's (1911) interpretation of the Schreber autobiography has frequently been subject to attack and criticism, a survey of the vast literature accumulated on the Schreber case can only impress one with the wisdom and insight revealed by Freud in his original formulation. No alternative explanation or theory of paranoia has been proposed which has merited comparable consideration, respect, and acceptance.

Major criticism of the traditional theory of paranoia elucidated by Freud has been centred around the invariability of the role of unconscious homosexuality in the dynamics of the disorder, in terms of varying ways by which the proposition 'I (a man) love him' presumably becomes transformed into a paranoid delusion. The striking contrast between Freud's formulation and the then current literature (e.g. Friedmann, 1908); Gerlich, 1908), however, would lead to the conclusion that Freud's primary contribution was perhaps not his elucidation of a relationship between homosexuality and paranoia, but rather was his demonstration of a way of thinking (the psychodynamic approach).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.