Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Lowenfeld, H. (1964). Comment on Dr Grunberger's and Dr Wangh's Papers. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 45:396-398.

(1964). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 45:396-398

Comment on Dr Grunberger's and Dr Wangh's Papers

Henry Lowenfeld

The two papers by Drs Grunberger and Wangh deal with such a complex problem that I can only try to single out a few aspects of it for my discussion.

I am in general agreement with the attempt of both authors to use psycho-analytical concepts for a better understanding of historical events. I think we are justified in so doing, as all historians use psychology implicitly, though they usually do not expressly state this fact. Especially, if the irrational element in human actions prevails, common-sense psychology is not adequate.

But there are several reasons which make our task very difficult. The main reason—and this point should not be neglected—is the fact that analytical characterology is still in an immature and undifferentiated state. If, for example, we speak of people of a compulsive character structure, we may find among them saints or criminals. This lack in our characterology makes analytical interpretations of historical events often unconvincing. Another reason for the difficulty is that the material we deal with is usually open to different interpretations on a factual level. And finally, it is of the nature of analytical interpretations, which means interpretations of unconscious processes, that they are often plausible and possibly right, but not necessarily correct. In an individual analysis we reach a degree of verification and conviction, or the interpretation is abandoned. In the interpretation of historical events we do not have the assistance of the patient, history does not respond to our suggestions, and it is difficult to reach certainty.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.