Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gifford, S. Murawski, B.J. Brazelton, T.B. Young, G.C. (1966). Differences in Individual Development Within a Pair of Identical Twins. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 47:261-268.

(1966). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 47:261-268

Differences in Individual Development Within a Pair of Identical Twins

Sanford Gifford, Benjamin J. Murawski, T. Berry Brazelton and Grace C. Young

Clinical and Theoretical Background

Our interest in twins developed during a psycho-physiological study of the normal personality, carried out since 1954 with Henry M. Fox and Arthur F. Valenstein (1961), (1965). We are investigating possible correlations between ego structure and homeostatic patterns in healthy young college men, including individual subjects and identical and fraternal twins. We have also observed some discordant adult twins, one of whom had a medical or psychiatric illness and the other was apparently normal, often the healthy donor for kidney-transplanation. In their developmental histories we were impressed by the importance of physical and behavioral charateristics present at birth, such as intrapair differences in size, feeding and sleeping patterns, motor activity, and perceptual responsiveness, which could be related to individual differences in adult personality structure, including identifications, choice of defences, predilections to neurosis and psychosomatic illness, and the use of special skills and sublimations. Individual development within twin pairs represented the outcome of a complex interaction among three factors: (i) the contribution of innate constitutional differences to early ego-formation, (ii) parental attitudes toward these individual differences that selectively augment or diminish their importance, and (iii) the relationship between the twins themselves, tending toward equalization and similarity or toward differentiation and divergent development.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.