Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Zetzel, E.R. (1968). The So Called Good Hysteric. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 49:256-260.

(1968). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49:256-260

The So Called Good Hysteric

Elizabeth R. Zetzel

There was a little girl

And she had a little curl

Right in the middle of her forehead.

And when she was good

She was very, very good,

But when she was bad

She was horrid.

This nursery rhyme must be familiar to most of you. It is particularly applicable to the analysis of those female patients whose presenting symptomatology and/or character structure overtly suggests an unresolved genital oedipal situation. This leads to a presumptive diagnosis of hysteria, a condition for which traditional psychoanalysis remains the treatment of choice. Follow-up studies of the analysis of such patients have not, however, been reassuring. In Boston, for example, we reported ten years ago:

Our reports so far tend to indicate that hysterical patients are, to put it simply, very good or very bad patients. (Knapp et al. 1960).

This conclusion was based on a review of one hundred patients evaluated as possible patients for supervised analysis. In preparing this paper I have also reviewed the initial clinical evaluation of nearly one hundred non-psychotic women. Of these, more than thirty had been in analysis, either conducted or supervised, over the past ten years. On this basis I hope to revise and explain our presumptive dichotomy and the distinction made by Easser and Lesser in a more recent paper between the hysteric and the hysteroid character.

As my opening jingle suggests, I have limited myself to the discussion of hysteria in the evaluation of female patients.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.