Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return from a journal’s Table of Contents to the Table of Volumes…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can return with one click from a journal’s Table of Contents (TOC) to the Table of Volumes simply by clicking on “Volume n” at the top of the TOC (where n is the volume number).

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Benedek, T. (1969). Training Analysis—Past, Present and Future. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50:437-445.

(1969). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50:437-445

Training Analysis—Past, Present and Future

Therese Benedek

The necessity of personal analysis for those 'who want to apply psychoanalytic technique' was expressed by Freud (1910) very early. Yet the evolution of the training analysis as the prerequisite and core of psychoanalytic education has been a slow process. This is not surprising. Psychoanalysis was conceived originally as an instrument of therapy; the personal analysis of the future analyst had the therapeutic goal of removing 'blind spots'. '[The idea] that one should be analysed for the purpose of learning the method had occurred to none of us …', said Eitingon (1937p. 351). Since therapy and the preparation for the profession were to be achieved by the same method, the educational value of the psychoanalytic process appeared secondary during the years and decades when Freud and his followers were mainly interested in establishing solid foundations for their newly won knowledge. Gitelson (1964), in his last paper, following a theorem of Thomas Kuhn (1963), points out that the 'psychoanalytic movement' was becoming a 'normal science' by organizing its training system to prepare for and safeguard the future of psychoanalysis.

This, however, was not easy to achieve; it took several years of struggle marked by crises in the budding psychoanalytic organizations and by the catastrophe of the Hitler years. To outline it briefly, the 'movement' began to organize its training system by the establishment of the Berlin Institute in 1920, followed by the Institute in Vienna in 1921 and by others soon after.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.