Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Grinberg, L. (1969). New Ideas: Conflict and Evolution. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50:517-528.

(1969). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50:517-528

New Ideas: Conflict and Evolution

León Grinberg


In spite of its tremendous impact on mankind, paradoxically enough, it has not yet been possible to place and classify psychoanalysis within any of the existing fields of knowledge.

It is usually agreed that the cultural development of our century has been deeply influenced by three outstanding thinkers: Einstein, Marx and Freud. The transcendence of their discoveries and of the revolution they have brought about in their respective areas is widely acknowledged. Einstein's theories resulted in a substantial change in modern space physics. Besides being a philosopher, Marx was the founder of scientific socialism, in which the interpretation of dialectic materialism is applied to the historical and economic processes of mankind. But whereas Einstein's contribution can be easily classified within the field of physics and mathematics, and that of Marx within a social, political and economic ideology, doubts still arise as to the position to be assigned to the body of theories, hypotheses and methods discovered and developed by Freud.

Among those authors who have dealt with this problem, some have concentrated their efforts on the scientific validation of the psychoanalytical theory (Brosin, 1955). Others have sought to include it within the domain of philosophy (Hook, 1959). Still others have held that it should be regarded as a new psychodynamic or mental science (Guntrip, 1967). There were also some who objected to considering psychoanalysis as a science (Home, 1966).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.