Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To keep track of most cited articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always keep track of the Most Cited Journal Articles on PEP Web by checking the PEP Section found on the homepage.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Lorand, S. (1969). Reflections on the Development of Psychoanalysis in New York from 1925. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50:589-595.

(1969). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50:589-595

Reflections on the Development of Psychoanalysis in New York from 1925

Sandor Lorand

This short essay will not attempt to provide a complete history of the development of the New York Psychoanalytic Society, but rather point out certain developments, with particular reference to the strong impact of some historical events, which furthered the development of psychoanalysis in America and especially in New York.

In 1925 when I came to America, I found a different attitude in New York towards psychoanalysis from that of Europe. Whereas European physicians and psychiatrists generally showed great resistance and intolerance toward analysis, in New York many were ready to listen to analysts and a sizable segment of the lay public seemed eager to learn about psychoanalysis. There was, to be sure, no lack of criticism and resistance to the Freudian theories among the more conservative members of professional and lay groups, but the general atmosphere was far different from the rigid antagonism prevalent in Europe.

The New York Psychoanalytic Society was organized in 1911, the same year that the International Psycho-Analytical Association was formed, with the New York Society as one of its charter members. Oberndorf's (1953) history of psychoanalysis in America reports little about New York for the years between 1911 and 1925. Apparently no notable events took place and no clear-cut trends were emerging. We gather from Lewin's (1962) reminiscences that the Society for many years was an informal club-like organization, whose members included physicians and psychiatrists who were friends of analysts, but the majority of whom were not analysed.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.