Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Laplanche, J. Kohut, H. (1970). Discussion of 'The Self: A Contribution to its Place in Theory and Technique'. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 51:175-181.

(1970). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 51:175-181

Discussion of 'The Self: A Contribution to its Place in Theory and Technique'

J. Laplanche and Heinz Kohut

SUMMARY OF THE INTRODUCTORY REMARKS BY THE AUTHOR (DOUGLAS C. LEVIN)

For his opening remarks the speaker took a briefer approach to the subject than that in the prepublished paper. He said that for him there were discrepancies and gaps in our knowledge and understanding. There were gaps between libido theory and ego psychology; between theory itself and technique; between, for example, the technical requirement for opacity in the analyst and our knowledge that, for the unconscious, there are no secrets at all. These discrepancies and disjunctions had led him towards a consideration of the self.

In 1940 in the Outline, Freud had said that the ego (or the id) was the great reservoir of libido—something like an amoeba putting out and withdrawing libidinal pseudopodia. But by this date Freud's ego was no longer the 'poor thing' of his earlier formulation. It was the ego, big and strong, the commanding, autonomous master in its own house. We could have asked ourselves how can this ego also be the amoeba? Hartmann (1949) clarified the problem for us. The self is the great reservoir of libido, of narcissism. The ego remains the great system of functions and of central control. Kohut (1966), (1968) has worked out for us the developmental paths of the self.

We can now say that the ego is a quite anonymous system of functions, the relatively fixed boundaries of which are limited by the tools man has available to his hand. As technology expands, so do the limits of ego function expand.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.