Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rascovsky, A. Rascovsky, M. (1972). The Prohibition of Incest, Filicide and the Sociocultural Process. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 53:271-276.

(1972). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 53:271-276

The Prohibition of Incest, Filicide and the Sociocultural Process

Arnaldo Rascovsky and Matilde Rascovsky

Psychoanalytic investigation has confirmed that incestuous craving is the most constant and universal sexual force in the life of the individual, and the main obstacle in the socialization process is the difficulty in overcoming the Oedipus complex, i.e. the endogamic sexual tie. We wish to stress, however, the importance of incestuous attraction as the most powerful initial sexual bond which is a vital and indispensable stimulus for the survival of the child and his later sexual development.

When confronted with the fact that the prohibition of incest is present in all sociocultural groups, we wonder what were the irrevocable, persistent procedures by which the most essential of the instinctual drives was deflected.

Side by side with the universal prohibition of incest, there is another generalized institution to be found in every culture; filicide. Primitive myths (Devereux, 1953), (1966); (Rascovsky, 1970a); (Rascovsky & Rascovsky, 1968), initiation rites (Reik, 1931), a study of human sacrifices (Devereux, 1953) and multiple manifestations of the various social systems reveal that slaughter, mutilation and real or symbolic abasement of children, expressed in quite a number of ways, are practices that have been universal since the dawn of culture (Rheingold, 1964).

In psychoanalytic practice, the endopsychic expression of these phenomena can be constantly observed in the interrelations between the superego and the ego (Berliner, 1966) evidenced by disorders such as obsessional neurosis, melancholia and suicide or by the punitive sanctions imposed on the ego, especially in the case of incestuous fantasies.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.