Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Wiedeman, G.H. (1972). Comments on the Structural Theory of Personality. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 53:307-314.

(1972). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 53:307-314

Comments on the Structural Theory of Personality

George H. Wiedeman

SUMMARY

At the present time, the structural theory is generally accepted by most analysts as the most comprehensive formulation concerning the psychic personality. However, if the structures id, ego and superego are conceived as 'more imagery than theory' (Waelder), the usefulness of these subdivisions may be limited and in need of reformulation and revision. It is maintained in this paper that the term 'structure' as applied to id, ego and superego imposes unnecessary limitations on psychoanalytic theory. Structure defined by its function (Hartmann) is a contradiction in terms. Freud's original topographical theory rested on the subdivision of the psychic personality into the systems Pcpt., Mnem., Ucs., Pcs. and Cs. When Freud subdivided the psychic personality into id, ego and superego, he used various terms to designate the new subdivisions: configuration, agency, province, realm, etc. (in the original German: Bildung, Instanz, Provinz, Reich). The terms structure and structural relations (Struktur, Strukturverhältnisse) were used by Freud less frequently in relation to id, ego and superego than the other terms mentioned above.

The term 'system' in relation to the topographical model was based on the usage of this term in the 19th century. If it were possible to apply the present scientific use of the term system to id, ego and superego, psychoanalytic theory would be better integrated into the mainstream of science, become more clearly understandable to workers in other scientific fields, and last but not least, benefit by achieving greater consistency and conceptual clarity than prevails at the present time. The subdivisions of the psychic personality, as any system or subsystem, can be characterized by boundaries, structures, functions and history, and can be correlated to the five metapsychological points of view.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.