Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To find an Author in a Video…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To find an Author in a Video, go to the Search Section found on the top left side of the homepage. Then, select “All Video Streams” in the Source menu. Finally, write the name of the Author in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area and click the Search button.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Binstock, W.A. (1975). Purgation Through Pity and Terror: A Reply to the Discussion by Clifford Yorke. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 56:225-227.

(1975). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 56:225-227

Purgation Through Pity and Terror: A Reply to the Discussion by Clifford Yorke Related Papers

William A. Binstock

Although Dr Yorke is a most gentle and gracious critic, we do appear to hold quite contrary views on some central issues. Whereas I propose (Binstock, 1973) to discard the concept of therapeutic catharsis, he is determined to retain it (Yorke, 1974).

Before taking up the intellectual argument, in which I shall endeavour to emulate his directness, I wish to say something about the essentially affective, non-verbal point which he saves for last. Dr Yorke cautions that we should not 'regard the film or the drama in a pejorative light', and goes on to champion the value of film-making in general and to praise a particularly beautiful example.

From its inception, the writing of my paper was attended by the risk that it might be misconstrued as an attack on theatre-goers, physicians, poets, hysterics, or others. Believing my arguments to apply in fact to everyone, I chose as the most effective strategy for averting this danger the style of the paper, deliberately composing a histrionic oration which cried out from every paragraph: 'I am one of you! I, too, love these things!'

Although Dr Yorke has dealt most kindly with this style, it failed with him. I can only hope that others will understand my intended message: art is demeaned by attempts to justify it through the rationalization that it is a treatment. As it was said of the sabbath and man, therapy was made for the artist, not the artist for therapy. I have by no means condemned the enjoyment of histrionics—only the pretence that they constitute treatment.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.