Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Davanzo, H. Szpilka, J. (1978). Colloquium on 'Affective Response of the Analyst to the Patient's Communications'. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 59:341-343.

(1978). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 59:341-343

Colloquium on 'Affective Response of the Analyst to the Patient's Communications'

Hernán Davanzo and Jaime Szpilka

Annastina Rilton (Stockholm), the Chairman, introduced the discussion by one or two brief remarks on the main papers by Pearl King (this issue) and David Liberman (this issue). From the floor León Grinberg (Buenos Aires) expressed his admiration for the quality of both papers and recalled Racker's contribution in connexion with Miss King's remarks on countertransference as a technical instrument. Grinberg pointed out that besides projective identification, there is always the possibility that the patient may interfere with the analyst's basic conflicts. Thus the analyst may have difficulties in controlling his counter-identification processes. When Miss King refers to the defence mechanism of identification with the aggressor, other aspects should also be taken into account, in particular those connected with the origin (predominantly external or internal) of the projected object. For example, when a mother is not sufficiently receptive (in Winnicott's terms), she will fail to understand her child by her normal projective mechanisms. Grinberg elaborated on the theme of the way the countertransference can be affected by the patient.

Isidoro Berenstein (Buenos Aires) commented that it was necessary to add to what has been said, the importance of the effect of the object on the developing ego of the child. The idea of the 'disturbed mother' has to be more finely differentiated, and in this it is necessary to understand that the child needs help in order to survive.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.