Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Furst, S.S. (1980). Summary and Concluding Remarks: 31st International Psychoanalytic Congress. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 61:225-236.

(1980). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 61:225-236

Summary and Concluding Remarks: 31st International Psychoanalytic Congress

Sidney S. Furst

In selecting the theme 'Clinical Issues in Psychoanalysis', for the thirty-first Congress of the International Psychoanalytic Association, the Programme Committee may well have been responding to the implicit challenge posed by Anna Freud (1976) in her address to the London Congress four years ago. After briefly reviewing earlier concerns and triumphs of psychoanalysis she stated that, more recently, 'the history of psychoanalysis is dominated by two efforts: (1) to deny, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, that analytic understanding reaches further than analytic therapy; (2) to restore by whatever means the former unity between exploration and cure'. While the ultimate clinical issues, the issues of cure, and of the efficacy of psychoanalysis as a therapeutic modality cannot be discussed in isolation from theoretical propositions, the participants in this Congress adhered rather closely to its theme. Theory was quite consistently and directly related to clinical issues and what emerged was a careful and comprehensive evaluation of psychoanalysis as a clinical discipline, and of our work as psychoanalysts.

Clinical issues occupy a special position in our field. On the one hand they are first order derivatives of the observations which we make in our daily work; on the other they constitute the immediate base for theory formation. Thus, their intermediate position between observation and theory permits them to serve as a bridge, linking the two. This linkage, and its corollary, the linkage between understanding and cure, are the hallmarks of psychoanalysis, which distinguish it from all other forms of treatment for mental disorder.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.