Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To save a shortcut to an article to your desktop…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The way you save a shortcut to an article on your desktop depends on what internet browser (and device) you are using.

  • Safari
  • Chrome
  • Internet Explorer
  • Opera

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Plaut, A. (1988). One Psychoanalysis or Many?. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 69:552-553.

(1988). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 69:552-553

One Psychoanalysis or Many?

A. Plaut

DEAR DR HAYLEY,

May I, as a past editor of the Journal of Analytical Psychology, the publication in which Goodheart's (1984) paper appeared, be permitted to comment on Dr Wallerstein's address 'One psychoanalysis or many'? (1988, 69: 1)

As Wallerstein admits, he is not well informed on Jungian literature; yet he has lighted upon the one article in that journal that could be regarded as damaging to Jung. The reason for this must be best known to himself. Here I only wish to observe:

1. There is truth in the statement that analysis of the transference was a weak point in Jung's early work. It is for this reason that Goodheart's paper was published. A courageous editorial decision the like of which I have not come across before.

2. That Wallerstein's comparison between 'C. G.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.