Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To turn on (or off) thumbnails in the list of videos….

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To visualize a snapshot of a Video in PEP Web, simply turn on the Preview feature located above the results list of the Videos Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Sandler, J. (1993). On Communication from Patient to Analyst: Not Everything is Projective Identification. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 74:1097-1107.

(1993). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74:1097-1107

On Communication from Patient to Analyst: Not Everything is Projective Identification

Joseph Sandler

Although this talk has been billed as a summary of the Congress proceedings, this is not a very apt description. In what follows I shall consider an aspect of the theme of the Congress, taking it as a starting-point for describing some related ideas of my own. So I ask for your indulgence.

For many years psychoanalysts held to the belief that psychoanalytic theory—or at least the particular version of it to which they subscribed—was an adequate basis for understanding the psychoanalytic process. The concepts of transference and countertransference had come to be regarded as sufficient to comprehend how the patient repeated the past in the present, and interpretation of the analysand's conflicts, of his deep unconscious phantasies, or of his or her internal object relationships, especially as they showed themselves in the transference, was thought to be enough to bring about appropriate psychic change. But during the development of psychoanalysis there has been a growing awareness that theory and practice are not completely in step, and indeed that the gap between psychoanalytic theory and psychoanalytic technique has been increasing. One can say with fair certainty that it was this increasing divergence between theory and practice which led to the multiplication and subsequent coexistence of different psychoanalytic theories, of different psychoanalytic 'schools'. In part, such differentiation into so-called schools was the outcome of the interest of analysts in special groups of cases, leading to a theoretical reformulation, which was then put forward as a general theory of psychoanalysis.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.