Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Spillius, E.B. (1994). On Formulating Clinical Fact to a Patient. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 75:1121-1132.

(1994). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 75:1121-1132

On Formulating Clinical Fact to a Patient

Elizabeth Bott Spillius


This paper approaches the issue of formulation to the patient by examining the interpretations offered to one patient concerning her reactions to three analytic holiday breaks. Detailed material from several sessions is presented in the context of the author's attempt to try to understand how she arrived at what she said and understood and how the interchange with her patient developed. The author suggests that the material shows a gradual deepening both in her understanding and in her patient's insight into the patient's responses to being left; to recognising that her analyst was pursuing an independent life of her own; and to becoming aware of her unconscious beliefs about her analyst's unconscious motives for leaving. The author concludes that her method of arriving at formulations varied. Generally speaking, conceptualisation of clinical facts does precede formulation to the patient and is then succeeded by validation or non-validation. In one instance, however, formulation, guided perhaps by an unconscious hunch on the part of the analyst, preceded conceptualisation. This particular formulation also led to far-reaching and integrating interpretations. The implication is that there are several methods of arriving at valuable formulations of clinical fact, none of which should necessarily be privileged.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.