Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To review The Language of Psycho-Analysis…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Prior to searching a specific psychoanalytic concept, you may first want to review The Language of Psycho-Analysis written by Laplanche & Pontalis. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fox, R. (1996). Panel Report: Who Maps Psychic Reality? Chaired by OWEN RENIK, San Francisco. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 77:67-69.
   

(1996). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77:67-69

Panel Report: Who Maps Psychic Reality? Chaired by OWEN RENIK, San Francisco

Richard Fox

The Chairman opened the panel by noting that its title was both ambiguous and provocative and said that ‘mapping’ implied that psychic reality was conceptualised in spatial terms, a favourite metaphor for Freud ‘the Conquistador’. The ‘who’ in the title raised questions about the authority of the analyst versus that of the patient and about the limits of the expertise of the analyst.

Arnold Rothstein began the discussion with his presentation of two clinical vignettes. In the first, after considerable analytic progress had been made, the analysand's negative image of his wife came to dominate the analytic stage. Rothstein felt this reflected a distortion but was unable to help the patient move beyond its manifest content. Only after the patient's wife had confronted him with her own therapist's comment (‘I wonder why he can't see beyond those ten extra pounds to appreciate all of your numerous positive attributes’) was the patient able to explore the defensive ramifications of his static negative image.

In the second example, the patient experienced two paranoid reactions during the first year of treatment. Rothstein maintained his anchoring hold in reality as his patient's analytic course carried her through these two frankly delusional episodes. He confronted her with the irrationality of her delusions, suggesting that her ideas were ‘crazy’ and grandiose and based upon underlying guilt and rage.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.