Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To suggest new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Help us improve PEP Web. If you would like to suggest new content, click here and fill in the form with your ideas!

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Robertson, B.M. (2002). Plenary Panel on Postmodern Psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 83(2):468-472.

(2002). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 83(2):468-472

Plenary Panel on Postmodern Psychoanalysis

Reported by:
Brian M. Robertson

Moderated by:
Jacqueline Amati Mehler

Jacqueline Amati Mehler, as Chair, welcomed the members of the audience and introduced the two speakers: Arnold Goldberg, the author of the plenary session paper entitled ‘Postmodern Psychoanalysis’, and Irma Brenman Pick, the discussant. Amati Mehler commented on the variable definition of the term ‘postmodern’ in contemporary culture. The modern world has cultivated the myth of progress, extolled the quantitative experimental method of science and accepted the power of universal reason; postmodernists challenge these beliefs. In contrast, they privilege diversity, pluralism, extreme relativism and the fragmentation of political groups. Amati Mehler further noted that although postmodernism suggested a unifying phenomenon that brought together philosophers, architects, novelists, painters, scientists and ethnic minorities, the reality was different. She referred to two types of postmodernism: one invented by artists, architects and then adopted in literature; the other invented by philosophers. The differences between these authors are many, at least in their relation to the past. Amati Mehler noted that the relation to the past is of particular interest to contemporary psychoanalysts, confronted as they are with theory and practice that derives both from tradition and from conceptual development.

The work of such philosophers as Lyotard and Derrida casts doubt on the whole inheritance of previous thinking, even though one may detect notions of refusal that at the same time represent a kind of re-appropriation.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.