Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Levinson, N.A. (2003). Panel on ‘Acting Out and/or Enactment’. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 84(1):151-155.
    

(2003). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 84(1):151-155

Panel on ‘Acting Out and/or Enactment’

Reported by:
Nadine A. Levinson

Moderated by:
Rosine J. Perelberg

The moderator Rosine J. Perelberg welcomed the panel and audience. Setting a frame for the panel she raised the question, ‘Are acting out and enactment different or similar concepts?’ She briefly commented on Freud's view of acting out with regard to its transference manifestations and its being a way of remembering through repeating.

Maria Ponsi, the first panellist, approached the topic by posing the question, ‘Do these concepts have a distinctive place or is one of the two terms preferred to the detriment of the other?’ She noted that with a radical paradigm shift based on a relational, two-person perspective the concepts of enactment and acting out have grown apart in meaning. She defined the term ‘acting out’ as an actualisation of an impulse through motoric action, embedded in classical drive theory and a one-person psychology. The term ‘enactment’ theoretically referred to a two-person interpersonal episode and reflected the analyst's inevitable subjectivity and participation. It was seen as an opportunity rather than viewed as an obstacle to analysis.

Her patient who had been in analysis for two years called at the weekend to ask if her analyst would agree to the patient's decision to come to a party the next day where they would both attend. Not able to cover her astonishment Ponsi told the patient, I can't understand the meaning of this sudden request since we have never talked about this during the sessions.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.