Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To find an Author in a Video…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To find an Author in a Video, go to the Search Section found on the top left side of the homepage. Then, select “All Video Streams” in the Source menu. Finally, write the name of the Author in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area and click the Search button.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Patterson, A. (2015). IJP Open - One Year Later. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 96(1):5-9.

(2015). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 96(1):5-9

IJP Open Report

IJP Open - One Year Later Language Translation

Anne Patterson

IJP Open has just celebrated its first anniversary. For the first time in psychoanalytic history, working papers can be extensively discussed with peers before the completion of the formal reviews. Opting in authors can receive immediate, international feedback on their work, registration is free and everyone can become involved, contributing anything from a few lines to a major essay. The formal, anonymized reviews are also posted, giving an intriguing insight into the reviewing process, which becomes more transparent. Nevertheless, the proposal to launch IJP Open provoked an outburst of controversy. Dissenting voices warned against the biasing of the anonymous reviewing system: surely reviewers would be constrained by knowing the identity of the author and influenced by the comments of others? Further, would authors willingly expose their work in progress so widely? Would anyone, apart from the official reviewers, contribute to the debate? Others hoped that IJP Open might, indeed, live up to the promise of its name, opening up communication and underlining the ‘international’ quality of the Journal. So, one year later, to what extent have these initial hopes and fears been realized? Are there any major emerging themes in the discussions? What might we expect for 2015? Echoing the increased transparency of the endeavour, I should state my position, which is that of a fairly new reviewer for the Journal who welcomed the arrival of IJP Open. A British analyst, I read only English and French so regret that I am unable to comment on the discussions in German, Spanish and Portuguese.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.