Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To bookmark an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to save an article in your browser’s Bookmarks for quick access? Press Ctrl + D and a dialogue box will open asking how you want to save it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Schneider, J., Sadow, L., Wilkerson, D.C., Solomon, B., Perlman, C., Duval, D., Shelby, D., Witten, M. (2016). Response to the Letter of Tillman Habermas. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 97(2):505-506.

(2016). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(2):505-506

Response to the Letter of Tillman Habermas Related Papers Language Translation

Jorge Schneider, Leo Sadow, D Cliff Wilkerson, Brenda Solomon, Caryle Perlman, Denise Duval, Dennis Shelby and Molly Witten

Dear Editor,

In survey research, a return rate of 60% is really excellent and certainly enough to discern trends. It doesn't mean that there was a dropout of 40%. Dropout is a very different thing. Some of the graduates declined to participate because of health reasons.

As for the survey being framed positively, while the questions were in the positive, it was a Likert scale which allows for negative responses, plus we had a narrative section which allowed for both positive and negative responses. People who were unhappy with their training experience were represented across all age groups. Yes, the older people tended to report a more happy experience. We are not saying that there are no problems in institutes; this exploratory study was only looking at broad trends. A follow-up study is being currently conducted to see if major trends hold up with a sample of more recent graduates.

Regarding what is an acceptable return rate, here are some examples from the literature:

One early example of a finding was reported by Visser et al. (1996) who showed that surveys with lower response rates (near 20%) yielded more accurate measurements than did surveys with higher response rates (near 60 or 70%). In another study, Keeter et al. (2006) compared results of a 5 day survey employing the Pew Research Center's usual methodology (with a 25% response rate) with results from a more rigorous survey conducted over a much longer field period and achieving a higher response rate of 50%. In

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.