Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Steiner, R. (2016). Reply to Bohleber and Colleagues' Paper on ‘Unconscious Phantasy’. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 97(4):1129-1142.

(2016). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(4):1129-1142

Letters to the Editor

Reply to Bohleber and Colleagues' Paper on ‘Unconscious Phantasy’

R. Steiner

‘In psychoanalysis nothing is true except the exaggerations’.

(T. W. Adorno (1974) Minima Moralia, p. 49)

Dear Editor,

In response to the paper by Bohleber et al. entitled ‘Unconscious phantasy and its conceptualizations: An attempt at conceptual integration’ (IJP 3, 2015), I would like to raise two important issues which I feel are missing in the paper. The first concerns the need to consider the history of psychoanalysis when discussing a psychoanalytic concept, in particular the cultural and linguistic areas. The second issue concerns the need for a more complete evaluation of Kleinian ideas, especially Bion's development of Klein's understanding of phantasy.

The Cultural and Linguistic Background of Freud's Unconscious Phantasy

I quite accept that the first issue I want to raise and remind you of could be considered if not my ‘pathology’ then at least an idée fixe of mine - my interest in the history of psychoanalysis. Die Phantasie and Traumphantasie are concepts belonging to the prehistory of psychoanalysis. And, one has to say, these terms do not belong so much to the natural sciences, but to German Romantic philosophy and literature.

As far as our discipline is concerned, we find them for instance in the Brautbriefe, in the love letters exchanged between Freud and Martha during the long period of their engagement. In 1882, already in the first letters they exchanged, Freud and Martha both tried to make sense of their dreams - their internal passionate emotional life - using expressions like die Phantasie and die Traumphantasie, not to mention even das Unbewusste.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.