Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Sandberg, L.S. (2016). On the Argument for (and Against) Neuropsychoanalysis. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 97(4):1149-1150.

(2016). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(4):1149-1150

On the Argument for (and Against) Neuropsychoanalysis Related Papers

Larry S. Sandberg, M.D.

Dear Editor,

I read with interest the recent contributions of Yovell, Solms and Fotopoulou (2015) and the response of Blass and Carmeli (2015). Blass and Carmeli are particularly critical of the clinical material pointing out the supportive nature of the intervention. They also argue that the familiar psychological finding regarding the fallibility of memory relegates the neuroscientific research to no more than a biological correlate of what is common knowledge amongst psychoanalysts. Blass and Carmeli (2007) previously observed that the importance of focusing on recollecting facts of past events in treatment was a ‘debated issue’ with the trend in contemporary practice supporting a more limited role for such approaches. I offer a brief vignette illustrating the use of neuro-scientific research on traumatic memory during the course of a four time per week analysis. I argue that such research can be relevant and helpful, though, in ways that are neither categorical nor predictable.

Many years ago as a candidate I struggled in my work with an adult analysand whose belief her mother had sexually abused her in certain ways as a young child allowed her to feel integrated as ‘victim’. The focus in supervision was on working with her ‘psychic reality’ - the analysand's experience reflecting some admixture of fantasy and historical reality. In the transference, the experience of victimization was enacted when attempting to explore her reality as over-determined by internal and external factors.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.