When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennanticon next to the title, like this: For example:
Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Lobel, J.B. (2016). Where the Wild Things Really are: Winnicottian Reflections on the Film Beasts of the Southern Wild. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 97(5):1431-1437.
(2016). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(5):1431-1437
Where the Wild Things Really are: Winnicottian Reflections on the Film Beasts of the Southern Wild
Janet Brown Lobel
If Max, of Sendak's (1963)Where the Wild Things Are, is the quintessential child of classical Freudian psychoanalysis, then Hushpuppy, the 6 year-old protagonist of Beasts of the Southern Wild(Gottwald et al., 2012), is the baby of current relational trauma theory.
Max had it easy. We're not quite sure what inspires him to don his wolf suit and “make mischief of one kind or another”. Oral aggression? (He does threaten to eat his mother up.) Oedipal issues? Be that as it may, when Max is exiled to his room for bad behavior, he manufactures a fantasy in which he cavorts gleefully with his internal wild things, gains control over them, and ultimately decides to surrender the thrill of uncontrolled instinctual abandon for the security of home and family. He returns to his safe little room and finds his supper waiting for him and “It [is] still hot.”
Max has the good fortune to be held, in a Winnicottian sense, in a safe, reliable environment that can survive his destructive rage (Winnicott, 1971). Max is able to use symbolic play to master the stresses and strains faced by any child as he navigates through the developmental waters leading to maturity. His imaginary boat trip to the land of the wild things takes place in a transitional space (Winnicott, 1951). With the security of an indestructible and containingenvironment bracketing his experience both before and after his voyage, it becomes safe for Max to venture into the world of fantasy play, and fantasy and reality remain clearly differentiated for the reader. We can assume that underlying Max's capacity for symbolic play is an ability to exist in the paradoxical intermediate zone that Winnicott called “transitional space”. By this, Winnicott meant the ability to enjoy illusion and to contain the “doubleness” of fantasy and reality(1951).
Not so for little Hushpuppy, however. Beasts of the Southern Wild tells the story of Hushpuppy and her father, Wink, who live “off the grid” somewhere in the vicinity (but not really) of New Orleans, in a sultry, swampy, isolated region that its residents call “The Bathtub”.
Hushpuppy and her Daddy live in adjacent, squalid, rickety shacks precariously perched on what look like woodpiles atop patches of land that appear to have sprung from nowhere. They eat dead chickens pulled from a picnic cooler and cooked over an open fire.
[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]