Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fain, M. (2018). Mentalization and passivity. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 99(2):479-484.

(2018). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 99(2):479-484

Mentalization and passivity

Michel Fain

The Report presented in 1962 at the Congress of the Paris Psychoanalytic Society (SPP), under the title Aspect fonctionnel de la vie onirique [The functional aspect of oneiric life] by Christian David and myself, included a project aimed at creating surprise. For some time already, Pierre Marty, Michel de M’Uzan, Christian David and myself had been working together on the problems raised by psychosomatics. In this connection, the name of the École psychosomatique de Paris [Paris School of Psychosomatics] was given to us. In other words, the reporters knew that, following their text, the intervention of Michel de M’Uzan and Pierre Marty would surprise the public and pose an unexpected problem: whilst the text of the Report had sought to clarify the mechanisms of the dream-work and their effectiveness as guardians of sleep, the paper presented by Marty and de M’Uzan signalled the existence of a form of mental activity negating the efficacy of oneiric hallucination. However, this mental activity—la pensée opératoire to call it by its name—was characterized by its close relationship with reality and the concrete task that the latter required. The task in question is, moreover, only envisaged in terms of its effectiveness, and not in terms of the personal history of the subject who is interested in the development of his own thought processes.

During this congress, the discussion did not consider the collusion that existed between the Report and the paper by Marty and de M’Uzan, in spite of the fact that everyone knew about the relations that existed between the members of the École de Paris.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.