Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: You can access over 100 digitized books…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that currently we have more than 100 digitized books available for you to read? You can find them in the Books Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Levy, D. (1983). Wittgenstein on the Form of Psychoanalytic Interpretation. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 10:105-109.

(1983). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 10:105-109

Wittgenstein on the Form of Psychoanalytic Interpretation

Donald Levy

SUMMARY

Wittgenstein objected to psychoanalysis not simply or mainly because its interpretations are unverifiable, but because they constitute a mythology imposed upon the patient; in form, such interpretations are instances of the genetic fallacy, he claimed. That is, such statements are reductive in an eliminative way. However, the passages in Freud's works alluded to do not support this charge, nor do others examined from this point of view. Freud's interpretations do not instantiate the defective form Wittgenstein had in mind, nor did Freud suppose that they did. So in the sense of mythology Wittgenstein employs, psychoanalytic interpretations do not impose a mythology.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.