Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see definitions for highlighted words…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Some important words in PEP Web articles are highlighted when you place your mouse pointer over them. Clicking on the words will display a definition from a psychoanalytic dictionary in a small window.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Glucksman, M.L. (1995). Psychodynamics and Neurobiology: An Integrated Approach. J. Amer. Acad. Psychoanal., 23(2):179-195.

(1995). Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 23(2):179-195

Psychodynamics and Neurobiology: An Integrated Approach

Myron L. Glucksman, M.D.*

As a discipline, psychiatry has evolved along two major paths that reflect its concern with mind and brain. Unfortunately, this has promoted a Cartesian dualism dividing the psychological from the biological, leading to the conceptualization of behavior in unidimensional terms. There have been a number of reasons for this dichotomization, including differing philosophical orientations, limitations of knowledge, and difficulty integrating biological processes with psychodynamic phenomena. The psychodynamic approach to understanding mental activity focuses on subjective, experiential, nonquantifiable phenomena. The neurobiological approach attempts to explain the same phenomena in objective, measurable, neurochemical, or neuroanatomical terms. For example, an accepted psychodynamic theory of depression explains it as a prolonged disturbance of mood resulting from an anticipated or actual loss or disappointment. On the other hand, the current neurobiological theory holds that it is a dysregulation of noradrenergic and/or serotoninergic neurotransmitter systems. Both explanations may be correct, although from different vantage points. Freud (1895a) in his Project for a Scientific Psychology attempted an integrated neuropsychological explanation of mental events. His lack of adequate neurobiological information forced him to abandon this endeavor, and instead, he developed a metapsychology for personality development, psychopathology, and behavior. Although Freud never suggested neurophysiological or neuroanatomical correlates for different aspects of psychic functioning (e.g., unconscious, ego, id), he nevertheless based his theory on a biological substrate. For example, his dual drive theory depended on biologically determined instincts. Even the term “libido” was defined as a “somatic” sexual excitation (Freud, 1995).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.