Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by Rankā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search. This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search. Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Music, G. Shulman, G. (2004). Clinical Commentary. J. Child Psychother., 30(3):347-347.

(2004). Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 30(3):347-347

Clinical Commentary

Graham Music and Graham Shulman

Introduction

We are very pleased to introduce our first clinical commentary, a new feature that we hope will appear regularly in the journal and encourage debate and discussion. The idea of course is not new; the British Journal of Psychotherapy, amongst others, has for many years had such a section, and the International Journal of Psychoanalysis has recently introduced a similar format. The idea of critical debate amongst readers is also not new to the JCP; in recent years we have published a lead clinical paper followed by several commentaries on the leading paper (vol. 27, no. 1), and in 1999 we published a symposium on ‘Frustration’ in which three authors (Anne Alvarez, Anne Harrison and Edna O'Shaughnessy) wrote of their different views of this concept.

We hope that these clinical commentaries are within this same spirit of open debate. The format we have used for this issue is that a clinician has anonymously presented a single session as well as some background, and we have asked three senior members of our profession to offer brief commentaries on what they found in the material. In this issue the commentators chosen all have links with different training schools; the aim is not to present ideological views that represent entrenched positions, but rather that discussion and original thinking might be fostered, and we think that this is certainly the case in these commentaries. The format we have used this time is not written in stone and may change, and so feedback would be appreciated, but the overall aim is to maintain a section within the journal in which debate, dialogue and the mutual exchange of ideas can flourish.

The name and background details of the patient have been disguised, and the therapist's name not given, in order to preserve patient confidentiality.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.