Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Vorus, N. (2006). Introduction: Central Concepts of the Freud-Klein Debates. J. Infant Child Adolesc. Psychother., 5(3):259-267.

(2006). Journal of Infant, Child & Adolescent Psychotherapy, 5(3):259-267

Introduction: Central Concepts of the Freud-Klein Debates

Neal Vorus

I've been Asked to Speak for 15 minutes about the History of Freudian and Kleinian thought, or at least the history of their differences, to set the stage for what is to come over this weekend. I'll begin by discussing the differences that emerged between the Viennese Freudians and followers of Melanie Klein during the Controversial Discussions of the 1940's, then follow this with a brief survey of the development of the British Kleinian and American Freudian perspectives since that time. Before I begin I'll just add the caveat that, while I'll be using the terms “Freudian” and “Kleinian,” I do so mainly in a historical context, and will say little about the current perspectives of these groups, especially on developmental issues. I'll leave that job to our distinguished speakers.

Melanie Klein

It may surprise some to learn that Melanie Klein was not always a controversial figure in psychoanalysis. She began her career as an analyst in Budapest, where she entered treatment with Ferenczi after reading Freud's book, On Dreams. It was with Ferenczi's encouragement that Klein began working psychoanalytically with children (Grosskurth, 1986), and her earliest papers clearly show Ferenczi's theoretical influence, especially her elaboration of the child's development from omnipotence of thought toward the dominance of the reality principle (Ferenczi, 1913). These ideas were a crucial precursor to Klein's developing views of phantasy that were later to prove so controversial.

But the greatest influence on Klein, from the beginning, was Freud.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.