Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gordon, R. (1971). Joe Kovel White racism: a psychohistory. 1970, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London, pp. 300. £3·15.. J. Anal. Psychol., 16(2):222-224.

(1971). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 16(2):222-224

Joe Kovel White racism: a psychohistory. 1970, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London, pp. 300. £3·15.

Review by:
Rosemary Gordon

Edited by:
Mary Welch

Man is an ambiguous creature: he is not solitary like the gorilla or the cat; he lives in large groups, yet he is not collective and collectivized like the ant. He lives somewhat like a herd animal, yet he also maintains a personal individuality, a personal uniqueness, and he exercises individual choice over more or less important areas of his behaviour.

It is thus natural that social scientists should search for concepts or models which might increase our understanding of the interrelationship between individual and collective phenomena.

Both Freud and Jung dealt almost exclusively with the individual in his essentially personal and private relationship to himself and to a few meaningful persons around him, yet they were both very interested in man's behaviour in groups. Both wrote papers in which they studied and discussed political, sociological and cultural phenomena and attempted to extend the insights gained in their work with individuals to the understanding of the character and behaviour of groups.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.